Abstracts

EEG Data Obtained During Clinical Neuropsychological Testing Demonstrates an Effect of Interictal and Subclinical Epileptiform Discharges on General Cognitive Performance

Abstract number : 1023
Submission category : 11. Behavior/Neuropsychology/Language / 11A. Adult
Year : 2020
Submission ID : 2423356
Source : www.aesnet.org
Presentation date : 12/7/2020 1:26:24 PM
Published date : Nov 21, 2020, 02:24 AM

Authors :
Daniel Drane, Emory University School of Medicine; Ioannis Karakis - Emory University School of Medicine; Casey Lynam - Emory University School of Medicine; Olga Taraschenko - University of Nebraska Medical Center; Ekaterina Staikova - Emory University Sc


Rationale:
We sought to determine if global cognitive function in patients with epilepsy (PWE) differs when electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormalities are present during concurrent neuropsychological (NP) evaluation.
Method:
We explored the association between subclinical epileptiform discharges (sEDs) and interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and global aspects of cognition in 79 consecutive patients with epilepsy who underwent continuous EEG monitoring during NP evaluation for diagnostic (15%) or presurgical (85%) purposes while on their standard antiseizure medication (ASM) regimens. As some researchers have suggested that the apparent link between IEDs and cognition represent epiphenomena of an underlying damaged neural substrate, we used functional status as a stratifying covariate to allow us to address this position.
Results:
EEG was abnormal in 68% of patients despite being on their standard ASM regimen. Epileptiform abnormalities (IEDs, sEDs, or both) were seen in isolation or coupled with diffuse or focal slowing in 38% of patients. Individuals with IEDs occurring during their NP evaluation demonstrated poorer scores in attention/working memory (forward and backward digit span), processing speed (symbol searching and coding) and speeded components of language (semantic fluency) tests compared to those with normal EEG tracings matched by their real-world, functional status. In two high functioning patients, performance was significantly better when these individuals were tested in the absence of IEDs, with performances appearing invalid when tested during periods of IED activity. No significant association was found between NP performance and non-epileptiform EEG abnormalities.
Conclusion:
A substantial proportion of epilepsy patients undergoing NP evaluation manifest concurrent EEG abnormalities, with epileptiform abnormalities associated with poorer global cognitive performance. As this pattern was observed regardless of functional status, this association appears to represent more than unrelated features coincidentally shared by the lowest functioning cohort. Coupled with our individual case data, our findings suggest that NP testing may be adversely affected by IEDs and sEDs going unrecognized in the absence of simultaneous EEG recordings, and set the stage for future studies to definitively establish this possible relationship.
Funding:
:Dr. Drane’s research efforts are currently funded by two grants from the NIH/NINDS, which partially supported his work on this manuscript (K02 NS070960 & R01NS088748). These grants provide salary support for Dr. Drane and his laboratory staff. He also receives grant funding from Medtronic, Inc.
Behavior/Neuropsychology/Language